I first chose to make a connection with “argument_75” because when I read the description of the book “Li cinque ordini dell’architettura civile di Michel Sanmicheli rilevati dalle sue fabriche /e descritti e publiati con quelli di Vitruvio, Alberti, Palladio, Scamozzi, Serlio e Vignola dal co” I could immediately see a close relationship with my book “i quattro libri dell’arquitettura” written by Palladio in 1570.
It is so because of its author but also because of its composition. Indeed, both books are Italian and refer to the same architect but the content seems to me to be very similar. My book also refers to innumerable theoretical aspects of architecture, including the Doric, Ionic, Corinthian and composite orders, but it is also composed of many technical and explanatory drawings that take up entire pages.
Finally, I also found similarities in the description of the book’s appearance rather than its content.
I could also see in the analysis of the book that it was not very thick and rather thin and that the large format of the book made it even easier to understand the drawings.
I was then able to find a relation between “argument_88” and my own work because I found part of my own book description “i quattro libri dell’architettura”, from which I quickly drew the conclusion that “Universae Architecturae Civilis Elementa” by Christian Rieger from 1756 was similar to “i quattro libri dell’architettura” written by Andrea Palladio in 1570. In fact, my book was also written in one language and then had a translation. Moreover, my book also covers civil architecture as it offers explanations on the basic orders and principles as well as on public and private houses. I would say that the last similarity between our books is their titles. These are very descriptive as you can tell what the book is about and how it is composed just by reading the title